In a project management context, a well-argued change recommendation should be documented based on what?

A well-argued change recommendation is best documented based on impact analysis data because this type of data provides a comprehensive assessment of how the proposed change will affect the project's objectives, resources, timelines, risks, and overall project success. Impact analysis involves evaluating the potential consequences of the change, which includes examining how it interacts with existing project elements and stakeholders. This thorough understanding enables project managers to make informed decisions and present persuasive recommendations to stakeholders, ensuring that the rationale for the change is well-supported by factual evidence.

While external feedback can provide valuable insights and perspectives, it may not fully capture the nuances of how the change will specifically impact the project's metrics. Prioritizing personnel focuses on resource allocation and team dynamics but does not directly relate to the justification for change. Cognitive biases can influence decision-making but should be recognized and mitigated rather than serve as a foundation for a change recommendation. Thus, relying on impact analysis data ensures that the rationale for change is rooted in concrete and relevant information.