In which model are configuration and security checks effectively automated to mitigate project risks?

The model in which configuration and security checks are effectively automated to mitigate project risks is the Continuous Integrity/Continuous Delivery model. This approach emphasizes the importance of automation throughout the software development lifecycle, particularly in deployment and integration stages. By automating configuration checks and security validations, teams can ensure that any changes made to the application or infrastructure are compliant with established standards and security policies. This minimizes human error, accelerates the release process, and enhances the overall security posture of the project.

Continuous Integrity focuses specifically on maintaining the integrity of the system while Continuous Delivery ensures that software can be reliably released at any time. This combination allows for seamless integration of changes while continuously validating the software against security and configuration requirements. As a result, it actively mitigates risks associated with deploying new code, making it an essential practice in modern software development and project management.

Other models, like cloud change control and on-premises change control, may include some automation but typically do not emphasize continuous integration and delivery as fundamentally as the Continuous Integrity/Continuous Delivery model. Tiered architecture, while beneficial for organizing systems, does not inherently involve automated checks for configuration or security. Therefore, Continuous Integrity/Continuous Delivery stands out as the most effective for automating these crucial checks to mitigate project risks.