Which assessment is typically conducted to ensure a project aligns with initial specifications after completion?

A quality assurance assessment is conducted to ensure that a project meets the defined requirements and adheres to the initial specifications after its completion. This type of assessment focuses on evaluating the project's deliverables, processes, and outcomes against quality standards established during the planning phase. By examining the specific criteria and benchmarks, the team can determine if the project's output fulfills the expectations and requirements set at the outset.

In this context, quality assurance encompasses processes and checks that help confirm whether the project outcomes are satisfactory, effectively evaluating whether the project not only meets the functional requirements but also aligns with the quality standards outlined in the project plan. This systematic approach ensures that any discrepancies can be identified and addressed, maintaining alignment with the original objectives of the project.

Other assessments, while important, serve different purposes. For instance, risk assessments are primarily focused on identifying potential risks to the project during its lifecycle rather than evaluating the completion outcomes. Impact assessments analyze the broader effects of the project on stakeholders and the environment, which is different from examining specific deliverables against original specifications. A technical feasibility study is typically conducted before the project begins to determine whether the proposed solution is viable, not afterward.